How To Fix SIC_NORM_ENGINE114 - Field of node is assigned to several interface variables

SIC_NORM_ENGINE114 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: SIC_NORM_ENGINE - Messages from normalization engine

• Message number: 114

• Message text: Field of node is assigned to several interface variables

What causes this issue?

If a changing variable of an attribute normalizing rule is assigned to a
field of a node, no other interface variables of the attribute
normalizing rule may be assigned to this field.
However, a changing variable as well as further interface variables were
assigned to the field when attribute normalizing rule &V1& (call no.
&V2&) was assigned to the fields of node &V3&.

System Response

The object normalizing strategy is inconsistent and cannot be executed.

How to fix this error?

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Procedure for System Administrators

Correct the object normalizing strategy.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

SIC_NORM_ENGINE114 - Details

• The SAP error message "SIC_NORM_ENGINE114: Field of node is assigned to several interface variables" typically occurs in the context of SAP's data modeling or integration scenarios, particularly when working with the SAP Integration Suite or similar tools. This error indicates that a field in a data structure (node) is being assigned to multiple interface variables, which can lead to ambiguity and conflicts in data processing.
  
  Cause:
  
  Multiple Assignments: The same field in a data structure is being mapped to more than one variable in the interface. This can happen if the data model is not designed correctly or if there are overlapping mappings.
  Incorrect Data Model: The data structure may not be properly defined, leading to confusion about which variable should receive the data from the field.
  Interface Design Issues: The design of the interface may not adhere to best practices, resulting in multiple variables trying to access the same data field.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Review Mappings: Check