How To Fix /SAPCND/ANALYSIS312 - Field &1 of table &2 is not contained in access &3

/SAPCND/ANALYSIS312 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /SAPCND/ANALYSIS -

• Message number: 312

• Message text: Field &1 of table &2 is not contained in access &3

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message /SAPCND/ANALYSIS312 - Field &1 of table &2 is not contained in access &3 ?

  The SAP error message /SAPCND/ANALYSIS312 indicates that a specific field in a table is not included in the access that is being attempted. This error typically arises in the context of condition management or access sequence evaluations, where the system is trying to access a field that is not part of the defined access.
  
  Cause:
  
  Field Not Included in Access: The field specified in the error message (&1) is not part of the access definition for the specified table (&2). This can happen if the access sequence or condition table has not been properly configured to include the necessary fields.
  
  Configuration Issues: There may be a misconfiguration in the condition tables or access sequences that leads to this inconsistency.
  Data Inconsistency: If the data model has changed (e.g., fields were added or removed), the access definitions may not have been updated accordingly.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Access Sequence: Review the access sequence associated with the condition type. Ensure