How To Fix /SAPAPO/RSP01054 - Order &2 is currently locked by user &1, a check is not possible

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /SAPAPO/RSP01 -

• Message number: 054

• Message text: Order &2 is currently locked by user &1, a check is not possible

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message /SAPAPO/RSP01054 - Order &2 is currently locked by user &1, a check is not possible ?

  The SAP error message /SAPAPO/RSP01054 indicates that a specific order (denoted by &2) is currently locked by another user (denoted by &1). This typically occurs in the context of SAP Advanced Planning and Optimization (APO) when multiple users attempt to access or modify the same order simultaneously.
  Cause:
  
  User Locking: The order is being edited or processed by another user, which prevents other users from making changes or performing checks on that order.
  System Locking Mechanism: SAP uses a locking mechanism to ensure data integrity. When a user accesses an order for editing, the system locks it to prevent concurrent modifications that could lead to data inconsistencies.
  Long-running Transactions: If a user has a long-running transaction, the order may remain locked for an extended period, causing delays for other users.
  
  Solution:
  
  Wait and Retry: The simplest solution is to wait for the user who has locked the order to complete their transaction. After they finish, the lock will be released, and you can proceed with your actions.
  Identify the Locking User: If you need to know who is locking the order, you can use transaction codes like SM12 (to view lock entries) or SM21 (to check system logs) to identify the user and the transaction they are performing.
  Contact the Locking User: If possible, communicate with the user who has locked the order to understand their needs and see if they can release the lock sooner.
  Force Unlock (with caution): If the locking user is unavailable and the lock is causing significant delays, a system administrator can forcefully unlock the order using transaction SM12. However, this should be done with caution, as it may lead to data inconsistencies if the locking user is still processing the order.
  Review System Performance: If locks are frequent and causing issues, it may be worth reviewing system performance and user transaction patterns to optimize workflows and reduce locking conflicts.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Lock Management: Understanding how SAP handles locks can help in troubleshooting. Locks can be exclusive (preventing all other access) or shared (allowing read access).
  Transaction Codes: Familiarize yourself with relevant transaction codes such as:
  
  SM12: Display and manage lock entries.
  SM21: System log for monitoring.
  SM37: Job monitoring, to check if any background jobs are causing locks.
  
  
  User Training: Ensure that users are trained on best practices for accessing and modifying orders to minimize locking issues.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to address the error message and minimize its occurrence in the future.