Message type: E = Error
Message class:  SADL_GW_ATC_CONSMPTN - SADL Gateway: ATC Messages for Consumtion Annotations 
Message number: 809
Message text: weight must be between 0 and 1
The weight of a ranking function is defined as a decimal number between
0 and 1, with two decimal places.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Set a valid value.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
The SAP error message SADL_GW_ATC_CONSMPTN809 indicates that there is an issue with a weight value that is being used in a calculation or configuration within the SAP system. Specifically, the error states that the weight must be between 0 and 1, which suggests that the value being provided is either negative or exceeds 1.
Cause: Invalid Weight Value: The most common cause of this error is that a weight value has been set incorrectly in the configuration or during data entry. This could be due to: Manual entry errors. Incorrect data being pulled from another system or table. Misconfiguration in the application logic that calculates or assigns weight values. Data Type Issues: Sometimes, the data type of the weight value may not be compatible, leading to unexpected values being processed. Business Logic Errors: If there are custom developments or enhancements, there might be a bug in the logic that determines the weight.
Solution: Check Input Values: Review the input
 Get instant SAP help. Sign up for our Free Essentials Plan.
Get instant SAP help. Sign up for our Free Essentials Plan. 
SADL_GW_ATC_CONSMPTN808 functionId &1: Object type &2 not defined
What causes this issue?  The ranking function refers a definition in Enterprise Search, where the ranking function specifies a refinement by object ty...
SADL_GW_ATC_CONSMPTN807 functionId &1: Object type cannot be specified
What causes this issue?  When referring a ranking function defined in Enterprise Search, '.' is interpreted as a separator between the id in...
SADL_GW_ATC_CONSMPTN810 @Consumption.ranking.parameterBinding missing for &1
What causes this issue?  Ranking function id &V1& has been specified in @Consumption.ranking.activeFunctions, but the corresponding parameter ...
SADL_GW_ATC_CONSMPTN811 @Consumption.ranking irrelevant, since no @EnterpriseSearch-annotation
What causes this issue?  The view carries @Consumption.ranking-annotations, but there is no @EnterpriseSearch-annotation. As Enterprise Search is curr...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.