How To Fix SA353 - Entity type $ already exists

SA353 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: SA -

• Message number: 353

• Message text: Entity type $ already exists

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

SA353 - Details

• The SAP error message SA353, which states "Entity type $ already exists," typically occurs when there is an attempt to create or define an entity type in the SAP system that already exists in the database. This can happen in various contexts, such as when working with data models, OData services, or other development scenarios in SAP.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Definition: The most common cause is that the entity type you are trying to create has already been defined in the system. This could be due to a previous development or an import of an object that included the same entity type.
  Transport Issues: If you are importing transport requests, there may be conflicts with existing objects in the target system.
  Namespace Conflicts: If you are working in a shared namespace, there may be conflicts with other developers or projects that have defined the same entity type.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Existing Definitions: 
  
  Use transaction codes like SE11 (Data