How To Fix RSODP_ABAP_CDS114 - Association &1 ignored: Field &2 already has special semantics

RSODP_ABAP_CDS114 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: RSODP_ABAP_CDS -

• Message number: 114

• Message text: Association &1 ignored: Field &2 already has special semantics

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

RSODP_ABAP_CDS114 - Details

• The SAP error message RSODP_ABAP_CDS114 indicates that there is an issue with the definition of an association in a Core Data Services (CDS) view. Specifically, the error message states that the association is being ignored because a field already has "special semantics." This typically occurs when there is a conflict in the semantics of the fields being used in the CDS view.
  Cause
  The error is usually caused by one of the following scenarios:
  
  Duplicate Semantics: The field that is being referenced in the association already has a defined semantic meaning (e.g., it is already defined as a key field or has a specific aggregation function).
  Incompatible Field Types: The field types of the association and the target field may not be compatible, leading to a conflict in how the data is interpreted.
  Incorrect Association Definition: The association may not be defined correctly, leading to ambiguity in how the fields are related.
  
  Solution
  To resolve the error,