Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: RSO_SEGR - Messages for TLOGO = SEGR (Semantic Group of ADSOs)
Message number: 248
Message text: Fields &1.&2 and &3.&4 have different types but have the same name
There are two fields with the same name but with different types in the
DataStore objects (advanced).
Since the fields have the same name, the system attempts to map both
fields to the same target field in the CompositeProvider.
This mapping is not possible due to the different types.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Please choose a different name for at least one of the fields.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
RSO_SEGR248
- Fields &1.&2 and &3.&4 have different types but have the same name ?The SAP error message RSO_SEGR248 indicates that there is a conflict in the data model where two fields with the same name have been defined with different data types. This typically occurs in the context of SAP BW (Business Warehouse) or SAP BW/4HANA when working with InfoObjects, DataSources, or queries.
Cause:
- Field Name Conflict: The error arises when two fields in the same context (like an InfoProvider or a query) have the same name but are defined with different data types (e.g., one is a character type and the other is a numeric type).
- DataSource or InfoObject Changes: If there have been recent changes to DataSources or InfoObjects, such as modifications in the data type of a field, this can lead to inconsistencies.
- Inconsistent Metadata: The metadata in the system may not be synchronized, leading to discrepancies in how fields are interpreted.
Solution:
- Identify the Conflicting Fields: Check the error message details to identify the specific fields causing the conflict. The placeholders &1, &2, &3, and &4 will indicate the names and types of the conflicting fields.
- Review Data Model: Go to the relevant InfoObjects, DataSources, or queries and review the definitions of the fields. Ensure that fields with the same name have consistent data types.
- Rename Fields: If the fields serve different purposes and cannot be unified, consider renaming one of the fields to avoid the conflict.
- Adjust Data Types: If appropriate, adjust the data types of the fields to ensure they match. This may involve changing the data type in the InfoObject or DataSource definition.
- Re-activate Objects: After making changes, re-activate the affected InfoObjects, DataSources, or queries to ensure that the changes take effect.
- Check for Dependencies: Ensure that any dependent objects (like queries or reports) are also updated to reflect the changes made.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the RSO_SEGR248 error and ensure that your SAP BW environment is functioning correctly.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
RSO_SEGR247
No object specified for data slice
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
RSO_SEGR246
CompositeProvider '&1' already exists
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
RSO_SEGR249
Field &1.&2 and InfoObject &3.&4 have the same name
What causes this issue? The same name is used for an InfoObject and for a field in different DataStore objects (advanced). Since the name is the same...
RSO_SEGR250
CompositeProvider '&1' does not exist
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.