How To Fix RSL_UI234 - Comparing provider field '&1' with CompositeProvider fields...

RSL_UI234 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: RSL_UI -

• Message number: 234

• Message text: Comparing provider field '&1' with CompositeProvider fields...

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message RSL_UI234 - Comparing provider field '&1' with CompositeProvider fields... ?

  The SAP error message RSL_UI234 typically occurs in the context of SAP BW (Business Warehouse) when there is a mismatch between the fields in a CompositeProvider and the fields in the underlying data providers. This error indicates that the system is unable to compare a specific field from the provider with the fields defined in the CompositeProvider.
  
  Cause:
  
  Field Mismatch: The field specified in the error message (&1) does not exist in the CompositeProvider or is not compatible with the fields from the underlying data sources.
  Data Type Issues: There may be a data type mismatch between the fields in the CompositeProvider and the fields in the underlying providers.
  Field Name Changes: If there have been recent changes to the field names in the underlying data sources or the CompositeProvider, this could lead to discrepancies.
  Inconsistent Field Definitions: The field definitions (like length, data type, etc.) may not be consistent across the different providers.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Field