How To Fix RSDRV_VPROHANA014 - No of decimal places in key fig. &1 not same as attr. in SAP HANA Model

RSDRV_VPROHANA014 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: RSDRV_VPROHANA - Message Class for VirtualProvider Based on SAP HANA Model

• Message number: 014

• Message text: No of decimal places in key fig. &1 not same as attr. in SAP HANA Model

What causes this issue?

The number of decimal places in key figure &v1& (# = &v3&) ) is not the
same as the number of decimal places in attribute &v2& in SAP HANA model
(# = &v4&).

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

How to fix this error?

If necessary, adjust the number of decimal places in the key figure or
in the SAP HANA model accordingly. Alternatively, you can ask your
system administrator to do this for you.

Procedure for System Administrators

If necessary, adjust the number of decimal places in the key figure or
in the SAP HANA model accordingly.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message RSDRV_VPROHANA014 - No of decimal places in key fig. &1 not same as attr. in SAP HANA Model ?

  The SAP error message RSDRV_VPROHANA014 indicates a mismatch in the number of decimal places between a key figure and its associated attribute in an SAP HANA model. This typically occurs when the data types or definitions of the key figure and its attribute do not align, leading to inconsistencies in how data is stored or processed.
  
  Cause:
  
  Mismatched Decimal Places: The key figure in the SAP HANA model has a different number of decimal places defined compared to the attribute it is linked to. For example, if the key figure is defined with 2 decimal places and the attribute is defined with 3 decimal places, this error will occur.
  Data Type Inconsistencies: The data types of the key figure and attribute may not be compatible, leading to discrepancies in how they are interpreted.
  Modeling Errors: Errors during the modeling process, such as incorrect mappings or configurations, can lead to this issue.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Key Figure and