How To Fix RSAN_WB101 - Deleting the field assignment for unknown target field &1...

RSAN_WB101 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: RSAN_WB - Messages for Analysis Designer

• Message number: 101

• Message text: Deleting the field assignment for unknown target field &1...

What causes this issue?

A field assignment exists for the target field &V1&. However, this
field is not found in the target structure.
This status can occur when fields have been deleted from the target
structure.

System Response

The system deletes the invalid field assignment.

How to fix this error?

Leave the dialog box for field assignment maintenance by confirming it
and save the corrected field assignments.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message RSAN_WB101 - Deleting the field assignment for unknown target field &1... ?

  The SAP error message RSAN_WB101, which states "Deleting the field assignment for unknown target field &1," typically occurs in the context of SAP BW (Business Warehouse) when there is an issue with field assignments in a transformation or data flow. This error indicates that the system is trying to delete a field assignment for a target field that does not exist or is not recognized in the current context.
  Causes:
  
  Field Deletion or Renaming: The target field may have been deleted or renamed in the data model, leading to inconsistencies in the transformation rules.
  Inconsistent Data Model: Changes in the underlying data model (like InfoObjects, DataSources, or InfoProviders) that are not reflected in the transformation can cause this error.
  Transport Issues: If the transformation was transported from one system to another, there might be inconsistencies due to missing objects or dependencies.
  Incorrect Configuration: The transformation might be incorrectly configured, leading to references to non-existent fields.
  
  Solutions:
  
  Check