How To Fix RESCSP018 - SCS receivables pstg terms of AP contract &1 cond.type &2 are different

RESCSP018 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: RESCSP - Settlement Participation

• Message number: 018

• Message text: SCS receivables pstg terms of AP contract &1 cond.type &2 are different

What causes this issue?

In contract &V1&, there are several different posting terms for the
advance payment condition type &V2&. However, service charge settlement
requires one unique posting term. This situation can occur, for
instance, if the advance payment condition type is used multiple times
with a different condition purpose within the same time period. This is
the case, for example, when subsidizers are used. In such cases, the
system is not able to determine if it should post to the master tenant
or to the subsidizer.

System Response

The settlement uses the standard posting term SPACE.

How to fix this error?

If you want to use a different posting term, then assign it as the
"posting term for service charge settlement" to all affected conditions.

Procedure for System Administrators

The "posting term for service charge settlement" was not available in
earlier releases. Therefore, in those releases, the only possible
solution was an implementation of the BAdI BADI_RE_SC_CR. If you have an
implementation of this kind that specifies the posting term in cases
where the posting term is not unique, you can suppress this error
message.
INCLUDE RECA_CUSTOMIZED_MESSAGE_INFO OBJECT DOKU ID TX

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

RESCSP018 - Details

• The SAP error message RESCSP018 indicates that there is a discrepancy between the posting terms of accounts receivable (AR) and accounts payable (AP) for a specific contract and condition type. This typically occurs in scenarios involving contract management or when dealing with financial transactions that involve both receivables and payables.
  
  Cause:
  The error arises when the system detects that the terms of the receivables (SCS) do not match the terms defined in the accounts payable contract for the specified condition type. This can happen due to:
  
  
  Configuration Issues: The configuration settings for the condition types in the accounts payable and receivables modules may not be aligned.
  Data Entry Errors: Incorrect data entry when creating or modifying contracts or condition types.
  Contract Changes: Changes made to the contract terms that have not been reflected in the corresponding receivables or payables settings.
  Inconsistent Master Data: Differences in master data settings for the vendor and customer involved in the