How To Fix PN135 - Derived period modifier & does not match internal per.modifier &

PN135 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: PN -

• Message number: 135

• Message text: Derived period modifier & does not match internal per.modifier &

What causes this issue?

By specifying the period determination of the payroll subunit on the
selection screen, the period modifiers that belong to this are derived
from table T549A.
Internally, the report uses a period modifier that is determined by
means of RMAC modules RP-DEF-TIME-PERIOD.
Both of these must agree.

System Response

How to fix this error?

You have two possibilities, to reach this agreement:
1. Choose a suitable payroll subunint on the selection
screen.
2. Modifiy the RMAC module affected.
The second possibility is, however, only to be chosen in exceptional
cases that can be justified, as changing the RMAC module can effect
the programs which also use theses.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message PN135 - Derived period modifier & does not match internal per.modifier & ?

  The SAP error message PN135, which states "Derived period modifier & does not match internal per.modifier &," typically occurs in the context of period modifiers in SAP, particularly when dealing with planning or reporting functions. This error indicates a mismatch between the expected period modifier and the one that is being derived or used in the system.
  
  Cause:
  
  Mismatch in Configuration: The derived period modifier does not match the internal period modifier due to incorrect configuration settings in the planning or reporting module.
  Data Inconsistencies: There may be inconsistencies in the data being processed, such as incorrect entries in the master data or transaction data.
  Versioning Issues: If you are working with different versions of planning data, the period modifiers may not align correctly.
  Custom Logic: If there are custom enhancements or logic implemented in the system, they may be causing the derived period modifier to differ from the expected one.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Configuration: Review the configuration