How To Fix OIJ_3WP060 - Inconsistent header field &1 for nomination key &2. Operation terminated

OIJ_3WP060 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: OIJ_3WP - Three way pegging message class, component of TSW

• Message number: 060

• Message text: Inconsistent header field &1 for nomination key &2. Operation terminated

What causes this issue?

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

System Response

How to fix this error?

The simulated Carrier Nomination consists of 1 - n line items. All line
items should have the same header fields of a Nomination (see
Nomination transaction).
The 3WP transaction defaults each header field if it is initial or
identical into one Nomination header line.
If at least two lines have different entries for at least one header
field, a manual user decision is required to obtain consistent header
field entries. The current operation gets terminated till the header
fields are consistent.

Procedure for System Administrators

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message OIJ_3WP060 - Inconsistent header field &1 for nomination key &2. Operation terminated ?

  The SAP error message OIJ_3WP060, which states "Inconsistent header field &1 for nomination key &2. Operation terminated," typically occurs in the context of the SAP Oil and Gas (OIJ) module, particularly when dealing with nominations and related data.
  
  Cause:
  This error usually indicates that there is a mismatch or inconsistency in the header fields of a nomination document. The header field referenced by &1 is likely a specific attribute (like status, date, or type) that does not align with the expected values for the nomination key &2. This can happen due to various reasons, such as:
  
  Data Entry Errors: Incorrect or incomplete data entered in the nomination header.
  System 
  Configuration Issues: Misconfiguration in the system settings that govern how nominations are processed.
  Data Integrity Issues: Corruption or inconsistency in the underlying database or data model.
  Versioning Issues: If there are multiple versions of the nomination, the system may be trying to access an outdated or incorrect