How To Fix MDG_HDB_SEARCH022 - Search view already exists with the entered name

MDG_HDB_SEARCH022 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: MDG_HDB_SEARCH -

• Message number: 022

• Message text: Search view already exists with the entered name

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

MDG_HDB_SEARCH022 - Details

• The SAP error message MDG_HDB_SEARCH022 indicates that a search view with the specified name already exists in the system. This error typically occurs when you are trying to create a new search view in SAP Master Data Governance (MDG) and the name you are using is already taken by an existing search view.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Name: The most common cause is that the name you are trying to assign to the new search view is already in use by another search view in the system.
  System Configuration: There may be a configuration or naming convention in place that has not been adhered to, leading to conflicts.
  Development Environment: If you are working in a development environment, it is possible that the same name was used in a different transport or by another developer.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Existing Search Views: 
  
  Go to the relevant transaction or table where search views are managed (e.g., using transaction code SE11 or