How To Fix MCEX308 - &1 is not a TABLES parameter of qRFC function module &2

MCEX308 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: MCEX - Extraction Interface LIS/BW

• Message number: 308

• Message text: &1 is not a TABLES parameter of qRFC function module &2

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

MCEX308 - Details

• The SAP error message MCEX308 indicates that there is an issue with the parameters being passed to a qRFC (queued Remote Function Call) function module. Specifically, the error message states that a certain parameter (denoted as &1) is not recognized as a TABLES parameter of the specified function module (denoted as &2).
  
  Cause:
  
  Incorrect Parameter Name: The parameter name being passed does not match any of the TABLES parameters defined in the function module.
  Function Module Definition: The function module may not have been defined correctly, or the TABLES parameters may have been modified or removed.
  Calling Convention: The way the function module is being called may not adhere to the expected conventions, leading to mismatches in parameter types.
  Version Mismatch: If there are multiple versions of the function module or if the function module has been changed in a recent transport, it may lead to inconsistencies.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Function Module Definition:
  
  Go to transaction SE37 (Function Builder)