How To Fix LTR2_ES292 - Inconsistency of RFC-destinations between ES and the analysis detected

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: LTR2_ES -

• Message number: 292

• Message text: Inconsistency of RFC-destinations between ES and the analysis detected

What causes this issue?

An inconsistency has been detected between the RFC-destinations used by
the embedded specification and the attached OBT analysis.

System Response

An error about the inconsistency has been reported.

How to fix this error?

Open the OBT analysis cockpit of the current embedded specification. The
options to resolve the inconsistencies will be shown if the analysis
cockpit opens.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message LTR2_ES292 - Inconsistency of RFC-destinations between ES and the analysis detected ?

  The SAP error message LTR2_ES292 indicates an inconsistency in the RFC (Remote Function Call) destinations between the Enterprise Services (ES) and the analysis detected in the system. This error typically arises in the context of SAP Process Integration (PI) or SAP Process Orchestration (PO) when there are discrepancies in the configuration of RFC destinations that are used for communication between different systems.
  Cause:
  
  Inconsistent RFC Configuration: The RFC destinations configured in the SAP system do not match the expected configuration for the Enterprise Services. This could be due to missing, incorrectly configured, or outdated RFC destinations.
  Transport Issues: If changes were transported from one system to another (e.g., from development to production), the RFC destinations may not have been properly transported or configured in the target system.
  System Changes: Changes in the system landscape, such as system upgrades or migrations, may lead to inconsistencies in the RFC destinations.
  Network Issues: Network connectivity problems can also lead to issues with RFC destinations, although this is less common for this specific error.
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check RFC Destinations: 
  
  Go to transaction SM59 in the SAP GUI and verify the RFC destinations. Ensure that the destinations required for the Enterprise Services are correctly configured and active.
  Test the RFC connections to ensure they are working properly.
  
  
  
  Consistency Check:
  
  Use transaction LTR2 to perform a consistency check for the Enterprise Services. This will help identify any discrepancies in the configuration.
  Review the results of the consistency check and address any issues that are reported.
  
  
  
  Update Configuration:
  
  If any RFC destinations are missing or incorrectly configured, update them accordingly. Ensure that the target systems are reachable and that the credentials are correct.
  
  
  
  Transport Management:
  
  If the issue arose after a transport, check the transport logs to ensure that all necessary objects were transported correctly. Re-transport if necessary.
  
  
  
  Documentation and Support:
  
  Refer to SAP Notes and documentation related to the specific version of your SAP system for any known issues or additional troubleshooting steps.
  If the problem persists, consider reaching out to SAP Support for further assistance.
  
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: 
  
  SM59: For managing RFC destinations.
  LTR2: For analyzing and checking the consistency of Enterprise Services.
  
  
  SAP Notes: Search for relevant SAP Notes in the SAP Support Portal that may address this specific error or provide additional troubleshooting steps.
  System Logs: Check system logs (transaction SLG1) for any related error messages that could provide more context on the issue.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to identify and resolve the inconsistency of RFC destinations that is causing the LTR2_ES292 error.