How To Fix KJ331 - Method of apport. for res. f.unreal. costs not suitable for'No C/U split'

KJ331 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: KJ - Cost Object Controlling for Make-to-Order Production

• Message number: 331

• Message text: Method of apport. for res. f.unreal. costs not suitable for'No C/U split'

What causes this issue?

The method you are attempting to use to apportion reserves for
unrealized costs to the <DS:GLOS.line_ID>line IDs</> separates reserves
into creation and usage.
However, you have not specified in the
<DS:GLOS.results_analysis_version>results analysis version</> that
creation and usage are to be separated.

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

How to fix this error?

Go into Customizing in the valuation method and choose a different
method of apportionment for the reserves for unrealized costs, or turn
on the <LS>Split creation/usage</> indicator in the results analysis
version.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message KJ331 - Method of apport. for res. f.unreal. costs not suitable for'No C/U split' ?

  The SAP error message KJ331 indicates that there is an issue with the method of apportionment for the resource for unrealized costs when there is no cost unit (C/U) split defined. This typically occurs in the context of controlling and cost accounting within SAP, particularly when dealing with internal orders, projects, or cost centers.
  
  Cause:
  
  
  Inappropriate Apportionment Method: The method of apportionment defined for the resource does not support the scenario where there is no cost unit split. This can happen if the configuration is set to use a specific method that requires a cost unit split, but the current setup does not provide one.
  
  
  
  Configuration Issues: The settings in the controlling area or the specific cost object (like internal orders or projects) may not be aligned with the requirements for the apportionment method being used.
  
  
  Data Inconsistencies: There may be inconsistencies in the master data or transaction data that lead to this error,