Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: /IWFND/MED_CHECK -
Message number: 039
Message text: Value '&1' not valid for field '&2' of '&3'
Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.
To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.
Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.
First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).
Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.
You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.
/IWFND/MED_CHECK039
- Value '&1' not valid for field '&2' of '&3' ?The SAP error message
/IWFND/MED_CHECK039 Value '&1' not valid for field '&2' of '&3'
typically occurs in the context of OData services when there is an issue with the data being sent to or received from the service. This error indicates that a value provided for a specific field does not meet the expected criteria or constraints defined in the data model.Cause:
- Invalid Value: The value provided for a specific field does not match the expected format, type, or range defined in the OData service metadata.
- Data Type Mismatch: The data type of the value being sent does not match the data type expected by the field in the OData model (e.g., sending a string where a number is expected).
- Field Constraints: The value may violate constraints such as length, uniqueness, or specific allowed values (e.g., enumerations).
- Service Metadata Changes: If the OData service metadata has changed (e.g., fields were added, removed, or modified), the client application may still be using outdated expectations.
Solution:
- Check the Value: Verify the value being sent for the field. Ensure it adheres to the expected format, type, and constraints.
- Review OData Metadata: Check the OData service metadata (usually accessible via a URL like
/sap/opu/odata/sap/<service_name>/$metadata
) to understand the expected data types and constraints for the fields.- Update Client Logic: If the client application is sending data, ensure that it is updated to comply with the current OData service definition.
- Debugging: Use debugging tools or logs to capture the exact request being sent to the OData service. This can help identify discrepancies between the expected and actual data.
- Consult Documentation: Refer to the SAP documentation or the specific OData service documentation for any additional constraints or requirements for the fields in question.
Related Information:
If the issue persists after checking the above points, consider reaching out to your SAP support team or consulting the SAP Community for further assistance.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
/IWFND/MED_CHECK038
No long text available
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
/IWFND/MED_CHECK037
Value set-based annotation value '&1' for '&2' not found
What causes this issue? Value set-based annotations must carry a value specified in table <EX>/IWFND/I_MED_AVS</>.System Response The sy...
/IWFND/MED_CHECK040
Mandatory Field NAME in '&1' is initial
What causes this issue? The mandatory field <LS>name</> has not been defined.System Response The system issues an error message and will...
/IWFND/MED_CHECK042
Inheritance of model identifier '&1' invalid
What causes this issue? Meta model inheritance is specified in table <EX>IWFND/I_MED_INH</>. The specified base meta model does not exist...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.