How To Fix /IWBEP/SBOD352 - ABAP field name '&1' is not unique

/IWBEP/SBOD352 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /IWBEP/SBOD -

• Message number: 352

• Message text: ABAP field name '&1' is not unique

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

/IWBEP/SBOD352 - Details

• The SAP error message /IWBEP/SBOD352 indicates that there is a problem with the uniqueness of an ABAP field name in the context of an OData service. This error typically arises when the same field name is defined multiple times in the context of an OData entity or when there is a conflict in the naming of fields.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Field Names: The most common cause of this error is that the same field name is defined more than once in the data model of the OData service.
  Conflicting Names: If there are fields with the same name in different structures or tables that are being used in the same OData entity, this can lead to ambiguity.
  Inconsistent Naming: If the field names are not consistent across different layers (like the database layer and the OData service layer), it can also trigger this error.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Field Definitions: Review the definitions of the fields in the OData