How To Fix /IWBEP/CM_V4_MED007 - Member '&1' already exists in enumeration type '&2'

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /IWBEP/CM_V4_MED -

• Message number: 007

• Message text: Member '&1' already exists in enumeration type '&2'

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message /IWBEP/CM_V4_MED007 - Member '&1' already exists in enumeration type '&2' ?

  The SAP error message /IWBEP/CM_V4_MED007 indicates that there is an attempt to create or register a member in an enumeration type that already exists. This typically occurs in the context of OData services when there is a conflict with the enumeration values defined in the service metadata.
  Cause:
  
  
  Duplicate Enumeration Member: The error is triggered when the system detects that a member (value) you are trying to add to an enumeration type is already defined. This can happen if:
  
  The same value is being sent in a request that is already defined in the OData service.
  There is a mismatch between the client and server definitions of the enumeration.
  
  
  
  Service Metadata Issues: If the OData service metadata has been modified or not properly updated, it may lead to inconsistencies where the client is trying to use an enumeration value that the server does not recognize.
  
  
  Incorrect Data Mapping: If the data being sent to the OData service is incorrectly mapped or formatted, it may lead to this error.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Enumeration Definitions: Review the enumeration type definitions in your OData service. Ensure that the member you are trying to add does not already exist. If it does, you may need to adjust your request to use the existing member.
  
  
  Update Service Metadata: If there have been changes to the enumeration types, ensure that the service metadata is updated. You can regenerate the service metadata to reflect the current definitions.
  
  
  Validate Request Data: Ensure that the data being sent in the request is correct and adheres to the expected format. Check for any typos or incorrect values that may be causing the conflict.
  
  
  Debugging: If you have access to the backend, you can debug the OData service to see the exact request being processed and identify where the conflict arises.
  
  
  Client-Side Adjustments: If you are developing a client application, ensure that it is aligned with the latest service definitions. Update the client code to handle existing enumeration members appropriately.
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  OData Services: Understanding how OData services work and how enumeration types are defined can help in troubleshooting these types of errors.
  SAP Notes: Check SAP Notes for any known issues or patches related to this error message.
  Documentation: Refer to the SAP Gateway documentation for more details on handling enumeration types and OData service definitions.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the error and ensure that your OData service functions correctly without conflicts in enumeration types.