How To Fix /IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT130 - Association with identical name as entity type '&1' already exists

/IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT130 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT -

• Message number: 130

• Message text: Association with identical name as entity type '&1' already exists

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

/IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT130 - Details

• The SAP error message /IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT130 indicates that there is an issue with the definition of associations in your OData service. Specifically, it means that there is an attempt to create an association with a name that already exists for the specified entity type. This can occur in the context of SAP Gateway and OData services when there are duplicate definitions or misconfigurations in the service metadata.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Association Definition: The most common cause is that there are multiple associations defined with the same name for the same entity type in the service's metadata.
  Incorrect Model Configuration: There may be issues in the way the data model is defined, leading to conflicts in association names.
  Service Re-Registration: If the service has been re-registered or modified without proper adjustments, it may lead to conflicts in the metadata.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check the Data Model: Review the data model definitions in your OData service. Look for any duplicate association names