How To Fix /IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT111 - Association name: '&1' ABAP field name '&2' already exists

/IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT111 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: /IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT -

• Message number: 111

• Message text: Association name: '&1' ABAP field name '&2' already exists

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

/IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT111 - Details

• The SAP error message /IWBEP/CM_MGW_RT111 typically occurs in the context of SAP Gateway and OData services. This error indicates that there is a conflict with the naming of associations or fields in your OData model. Specifically, it means that an association name or an ABAP field name you are trying to define already exists in the context of the OData service.
  
  Cause:
  
  
  Duplicate Names: The most common cause of this error is that you are trying to create an association or field with a name that already exists in the data model. This can happen if:
  
  You have defined multiple associations or fields with the same name in the same entity or across different entities.
  There is a naming conflict due to inheritance or composition in your data model.
  
  
  
  Model Changes: If you have made changes to the data model (like adding new fields or associations) without properly updating the service or regenerating the metadata,