How To Fix ICL_BRF126 - Field &2 is missing in table &1

ICL_BRF126 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: ICL_BRF - Messages of BRF-Related Claims Objects

• Message number: 126

• Message text: Field &2 is missing in table &1

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

ICL_BRF126 - Details

• The SAP error message ICL_BRF126, which states "Field &2 is missing in table &1," typically occurs in the context of the Business Rules Framework (BRF) within the SAP system. This error indicates that a specific field (denoted as &2) is expected to be present in a particular table (denoted as &1) but is not found.
  
  Cause:
  
  Field Definition Issues: The field that is expected may not be defined in the specified table. This could be due to a configuration error or a missing field in the database schema.
  Data Model Changes: If there have been recent changes to the data model, such as adding or removing fields, the BRF rules may not be updated accordingly.
  Transport Issues: If the system has recently undergone a transport of changes, the transport may not have included all necessary objects, leading to missing fields.
  Version Mismatch: There may be a version mismatch between the BRF rules and the underlying