How To Fix HRPAYDEDFLST110 - Relevant wage types &1 are different in fictitious run and update run

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: HRPAYDEDFLST - Messages for Fictitious Run Control

• Message number: 110

• Message text: Relevant wage types &1 are different in fictitious run and update run

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message HRPAYDEDFLST110 - Relevant wage types &1 are different in fictitious run and update run ?

  The SAP error message HRPAYDEDFLST110 indicates that there is a discrepancy between the wage types in a fictitious run (simulation) and an update run (actual processing) in the payroll process. This error typically arises during the payroll processing in the Human Resources (HR) module, particularly in the payroll area.
  Cause:
  The error occurs when the wage types that are being processed in the fictitious run do not match those in the update run. This can happen due to several reasons, including:
  
  Configuration Issues: There may be inconsistencies in the payroll configuration settings, such as wage type definitions or rules that differ between the two runs.
  Data Changes: Changes made to employee master data or payroll data between the fictitious run and the update run can lead to differences in wage types.
  Custom Logic: If there are custom payroll schemas or rules that are applied differently in the two runs, this can cause discrepancies.
  Incorrect Payroll Period: Running the payroll for different periods without proper adjustments can lead to mismatched wage types.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve the HRPAYDEDFLST110 error, you can take the following steps:
  
  Check Configuration: Review the payroll configuration settings to ensure that the wage types are correctly defined and consistent across both runs.
  Review Changes: Investigate any changes made to employee data or payroll settings between the fictitious and update runs. Ensure that no changes were made that could affect the wage types.
  Run Consistency Checks: Use SAP transaction codes like PE51 (for wage type reporter) or PC00_MXX_CALC (for payroll calculation) to analyze the wage types and identify discrepancies.
  Re-run Payroll: If necessary, re-run the fictitious payroll run to ensure that it reflects the same data as the update run.
  Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or notes related to payroll processing for any known issues or additional troubleshooting steps.
  Engage SAP Support: If the issue persists, consider reaching out to SAP support for assistance, especially if it involves complex configurations or customizations.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: Familiarize yourself with relevant transaction codes such as PA03 (for maintaining wage types), PC00_MXX_CALC (for payroll calculation), and PE51 (for wage type reporter).
  SAP Notes: Check for any SAP Notes that may address this specific error or provide guidance on payroll discrepancies.
  Testing Environment: If possible, replicate the issue in a testing environment to analyze the differences without affecting production data.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to identify the cause of the error and implement a solution to resolve it.