Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: GRPG - Grouping/Pegging for Individual Project Planning
Message number: 126
Message text: Pegging created inconsistency in validity assignments
WBS element &v1% could not be assigned unambiguously to a grouping
element. &v1& has been assigned to several grouping elements tha have
the same validity (plant/MRP group).
Processing is not continued
Check your entries for WBS element &v1& in the assignment table and
make sure that all the grouping elements, that &v1& has been asigned
to, differ in the assignment to a plant/MRP group in the validity
table.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
GRPG126
- Pegging created inconsistency in validity assignments ?The SAP error message GRPG126, which states "Pegging created inconsistency in validity assignments," typically occurs in the context of production planning and inventory management. This error is related to the pegging process, which is used to link requirements (like production orders) to their corresponding supply (like purchase orders or stock).
Cause:
The inconsistency usually arises due to one of the following reasons:
Data Integrity Issues: There may be inconsistencies in the validity periods of the pegged items. For example, if a production order is pegged to a purchase order that has a different validity period, this can lead to conflicts.
Changes in Master Data: If there have been recent changes to the material master data, such as changes in the validity dates or status of the materials, it can lead to inconsistencies.
Manual Adjustments: Manual changes to the pegging assignments or related documents can also create inconsistencies.
System Bugs or Configuration Issues: Sometimes, the error can be due to bugs in the SAP system or incorrect configuration settings.
Solution:
To resolve the GRPG126 error, you can take the following steps:
Check Validity Periods: Review the validity periods of the pegged items. Ensure that the production order and the supply (purchase order or stock) have compatible validity periods.
Review Master Data: Check the material master data for any inconsistencies or recent changes that might have affected the pegging.
Re-evaluate Pegging Assignments: If manual changes were made, consider reverting those changes or re-evaluating the pegging assignments to ensure they are correct.
Use Transaction Codes: Utilize transaction codes like MD04 (Stock/Requirements List) or MD05 (Individual Display of MRP List) to analyze the pegging and see where the inconsistencies lie.
Check for System Notes: Look for any SAP Notes or patches that might address known issues related to this error.
Consult with SAP Support: If the issue persists, consider reaching out to SAP support for further assistance, especially if it appears to be a bug or a deeper configuration issue.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to identify and resolve the inconsistency causing the GRPG126 error in your SAP system.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
GRPG125
WBS element & already has an unique assignment
What causes this issue? You want to assign WBS element &v1& to a type <ls>2</> <DS:DE.GRPSPKZ>grouping WBS element</>...
GRPG124
WBS element & can only be assigned to one grouping WBS element
What causes this issue? You want to assign WBS element &v1& to a type '1' grouping WBS element. Type '1' requires unique ...
GRPG127
The simualtion version of WBS element & cannot be used
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
GRPG128
Deleting an automatically created assignement is not allowed
What causes this issue? You want to delete an assignment that was generated for project &v1& in the background using <DS:DE.GRONTOP>aut...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.