How To Fix GLE_MCA499 - Fixed values: At least one invalid field (&1) customized for variant &2

GLE_MCA499 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: GLE_MCA - Multicurrency Accounting

• Message number: 499

• Message text: Fixed values: At least one invalid field (&1) customized for variant &2

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message GLE_MCA499 - Fixed values: At least one invalid field (&1) customized for variant &2 ?

  The SAP error message GLE_MCA499 indicates that there is an issue with the configuration of a variant in the system. Specifically, it suggests that at least one of the fields defined in the variant is invalid or not properly configured. This error typically occurs in the context of financial accounting or controlling modules, where variants are used to customize reports or data selections.
  
  Cause:
  
  
  Invalid Field Configuration: The field specified in the error message (&1) is not valid for the variant (&2). This could be due to:
  
  The field being deleted or renamed in the system.
  The field not being available in the current context or version of the program.
  Incorrect data type or format for the field.
  
  
  
  Variant Not Properly Defined: The variant itself may not be properly defined or may have been corrupted.
  
  
  Authorization Issues: Sometimes, the user may not have the necessary authorizations to access certain fields or data.
  
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Field Validity:
  
  Go to the transaction