How To Fix GK682 - The definition of method &1 is inconsistent.

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: GK - Messages for SAP Consolidation

• Message number: 682

• Message text: The definition of method &1 is inconsistent.

What causes this issue?

The method &V1& has been defined inconsistently in regards to the
treatment of (negative) goodwill.
This can be the case when you have defined the method to amortize the
(negative) goodwill but did not define when the amortization is to
begin. This also applies to the proportional elimination of (negativen)
goodwill.

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

How to fix this error?

Define the beginning period in either the method itself, or in the
global settings, depending on the system utilization.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message GK682 - The definition of method &1 is inconsistent. ?

  The SAP error message GK682, which states "The definition of method &1 is inconsistent," typically occurs in the context of Business Add-Ins (BAdIs) or enhancement implementations in SAP. This error indicates that there is a mismatch or inconsistency in the method definition of a BAdI implementation.
  Causes:
  
  Inconsistent Method Signature: The method signature in the implementation does not match the definition in the interface. This could be due to changes in the BAdI definition after the implementation was created.
  Missing Parameters: Required parameters in the method definition may be missing in the implementation.
  Data Type Mismatch: The data types of parameters in the implementation do not match those defined in the BAdI interface.
  Changes in BAdI Definition: If the BAdI definition was modified (e.g., additional parameters were added), existing implementations may become inconsistent.
  Transport Issues: If the BAdI definition was transported to a different system without the corresponding implementation, inconsistencies can arise.
  
  Solutions:
  
  Check Method Signature: Review the method signature in the BAdI definition and compare it with the implementation. Ensure that they match in terms of parameter names, types, and order.
  Update Implementation: If there are discrepancies, update the implementation to align with the current BAdI definition. This may involve adding missing parameters or changing data types.
  Re-implement the BAdI: If the implementation is significantly out of sync, consider re-implementing the BAdI to ensure it adheres to the latest definition.
  Transport Consistency: Ensure that all relevant transports are correctly applied in the target system. If the BAdI definition was transported, make sure the implementation is also present.
  Check for Notes: Look for SAP Notes related to the specific BAdI or error message. Sometimes, SAP provides fixes or recommendations for known issues.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: You can use transaction codes like SE18 (for BAdI definitions) and SE19 (for BAdI implementations) to investigate and modify BAdI definitions and implementations.
  Debugging: If necessary, you can debug the BAdI implementation to identify where the inconsistency arises during execution.
  Documentation: Review the SAP documentation for the specific BAdI to understand its intended use and any changes that may have been made in recent updates.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the GK682 error and ensure that your BAdI implementations are consistent with their definitions.