Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: GC - Error Messages for Consolidation/Extended General Ledger
Message number: 173
Message text: 'One-sided elimination' indicator not consistent
More than one rule for the intercompany eliminations
has been assigned to a single
document type. The indicator 'One-sided elimination' is not consistent
among these rules.
The system will use the setting from the first rule.
Make the indicator settings consistent among all of the rules
that are assigned to a particular document type.
or
Use more document types if different settings among the rules are
required.
Consistent indicator settings are necessary among all rules
assigned to a particular document type.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Then, run the program once per document type.Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
GC173
- 'One-sided elimination' indicator not consistent ?The SAP error message GC173, which states "One-sided elimination indicator not consistent," typically occurs in the context of consolidation processes within SAP Financials, particularly when dealing with group reporting or consolidation of financial statements.
Cause:
The error arises when there is an inconsistency in the settings for one-sided elimination indicators in the consolidation settings. This can happen due to:
- Inconsistent Configuration: The one-sided elimination indicator may not be set correctly for the entities involved in the consolidation process.
- Data Entry Errors: Incorrect or incomplete data entries in the master data or transaction data can lead to this inconsistency.
- Changes in Master Data: If there have been recent changes to the master data (like changes in the ownership structure or changes in the consolidation group), these changes may not have been reflected properly in the elimination settings.
- Missing or Incorrect Relationships: The relationships between entities may not be defined correctly, leading to inconsistencies in how eliminations are processed.
Solution:
To resolve the GC173 error, you can follow these steps:
Check One-Sided Elimination Settings:
- Go to the consolidation settings in SAP and verify the one-sided elimination indicators for the relevant entities.
- Ensure that the settings are consistent across all entities involved in the consolidation.
Review Master Data:
- Check the master data for the entities involved in the consolidation. Ensure that all necessary fields are filled out correctly, especially those related to ownership and consolidation groups.
Validate Relationships:
- Review the relationships between the entities in the consolidation. Ensure that all relationships are correctly defined and that there are no missing links.
Run Consistency Checks:
- Use the consistency check tools available in SAP to identify any discrepancies in the consolidation settings or data.
Consult Documentation:
- Refer to SAP documentation or help resources for specific guidance on the one-sided elimination settings and how they should be configured.
Seek Support:
- If the issue persists, consider reaching out to your SAP support team or consulting with an SAP expert who specializes in financial consolidation.
Related Information:
OB52
(for fiscal year variant), OB37
(for account determination), and OBY6
(for consolidation settings).By following these steps, you should be able to identify and resolve the inconsistency causing the GC173 error in your SAP system.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
GC172
'Currency split' indicator is not consistent.
What causes this issue? More than one rule for intercompany eliminations has been assigned to a document type. Among these rules the 'currency ...
GC171
IC Elimination not defined for company & in subgroup &
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
GC174
'Document per transaction type' indicator not consistent
What causes this issue? More than one regulation for intercompany eliminations have been assigned to one document type. The 'Document per Trans...
GC175
'No proportional elimination' indicator is not consistent
What causes this issue? More than one rule for the intercompany eliminations have been assigned to one document type. The 'No proportional elim...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.