How To Fix FMCA_BRFPLUS150 - Low value type is invalid for condition &1 in rule &2 of field &3

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: FMCA_BRFPLUS - PSCD: BRFPLUS in TRM

• Message number: 150

• Message text: Low value type is invalid for condition &1 in rule &2 of field &3

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message FMCA_BRFPLUS150 - Low value type is invalid for condition &1 in rule &2 of field &3 ?

  The SAP error message FMCA_BRFPLUS150 indicates that there is an issue with the value type used in a condition within a Business Rule Framework (BRF+) rule. Specifically, it suggests that the low value type specified for a condition is invalid. This can occur in various scenarios where rules are defined, particularly when dealing with data types and value ranges.
  
  Cause:
  
  Invalid Data Type: The low value type specified in the condition does not match the expected data type for the field being evaluated. For example, if the field is expected to be a numeric type but a string is provided, this error may occur.
  Incorrect Configuration: The rule may have been incorrectly configured, leading to a mismatch between the expected and provided value types.
  Field Definition Issues: The field definition in the BRF+ application may not align with the data types being used in the conditions.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Data Types: Review the data types of the