How To Fix FINS_FI_MIG020 - Tables &1 and &2 are consistent with respect to field names/field lengths

FINS_FI_MIG020 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: FINS_FI_MIG - SAP S/4HANA Finance: Data Migration

• Message number: 020

• Message text: Tables &1 and &2 are consistent with respect to field names/field lengths

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

FINS_FI_MIG020 - Details

• The SAP error message FINS_FI_MIG020 indicates that there is a consistency issue between two tables in terms of their field names and field lengths during a migration or data transfer process. This error typically arises in the context of financial data migration, particularly when using tools like the SAP S/4HANA Migration Cockpit or similar data migration tools.
  
  Cause:
  
  Field Name Mismatch: The field names in the two tables being compared do not match. This could be due to differences in naming conventions or changes in the data model.
  Field Length Mismatch: The lengths of the fields in the two tables are inconsistent. For example, if one table has a field defined as VARCHAR(50) and the other as VARCHAR(100), this will trigger the error.
  Data Model Changes: If there have been changes in the underlying data model (for example, during an upgrade or migration to S/4HANA), the expected structure of the tables may have changed,