How To Fix FINS_ACDOC_UTIL027 - Fiscal year variant not unique in ledger group &1 / comp. code &2 (&3/&4)

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: FINS_ACDOC_UTIL - Messages for package FINS_ACDOC_UTIL

• Message number: 027

• Message text: Fiscal year variant not unique in ledger group &1 / comp. code &2 (&3/&4)

What causes this issue?

The current process requires a unique fiscal year variant for all
selected ledgers in company &V2&.
For the ledgers in ledger group &V1&, fiscal year variants &V3& and &V4&
are relevant.

System Response

The processing is stopped.

How to fix this error?

Ensure a unique fiscal year variant by specifying a ledger group
accordingly.

Procedure for System Administrators

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message FINS_ACDOC_UTIL027 - Fiscal year variant not unique in ledger group &1 / comp. code &2 (&3/&4) ?

  The SAP error message FINS_ACDOC_UTIL027 indicates that there is a problem with the fiscal year variant configuration in the context of a specific ledger group and company code. This error typically arises when the system finds multiple fiscal year variants assigned to the same ledger group and company code, which leads to ambiguity in processing financial transactions.
  
  Cause:
  
  Duplicate Fiscal Year Variants: The primary cause of this error is that more than one fiscal year variant is assigned to the same ledger group and company code combination. This can happen due to incorrect configuration or changes made in the system that were not properly managed.
  Configuration Errors: Changes in the configuration of the ledger or company code settings may have led to inconsistencies in the fiscal year variant assignments.
  Data Migration Issues: If data was migrated from another system or if there were changes in the organizational structure, it could lead to duplicate entries.
  
  
  Solution:
  To