How To Fix FDT_CP_MSG162 - Ruleservices &1 and &2 have different signatures

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: FDT_CP_MSG -

• Message number: 162

• Message text: Ruleservices &1 and &2 have different signatures

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message FDT_CP_MSG162 - Ruleservices &1 and &2 have different signatures ?

  The SAP error message FDT_CP_MSG162 indicates that there is a mismatch in the signatures of two rule services being compared or used in a decision table or rule set. This typically occurs in the context of SAP's Business Rules Framework (BRF+) or similar rule management tools where rules are defined and executed.
  Cause:
  The error arises when:
  
  Different Parameter Types: The two rule services have different parameter types or counts. For example, one service might expect an integer while the other expects a string.
  Inconsistent Return Types: The return types of the two services are not the same, leading to a conflict when they are invoked together.
  Versioning Issues: If one of the rule services has been updated or modified without corresponding changes to the other, this can lead to signature mismatches.
  Configuration Errors: Incorrect configuration or mapping of the rule services in the decision logic can also lead to this error.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve the error, you can take the following steps:
  
  
  Check Signatures: Review the signatures of both rule services involved in the error. Ensure that they have the same number of parameters and that the types of each parameter match.
  
  
  Update Rule Services: If one of the rule services has been modified, ensure that the other service is updated accordingly to maintain consistency in signatures.
  
  
  Review Decision Logic: Examine the decision table or rule set where the services are being used. Ensure that the correct services are being called and that they are compatible.
  
  
  Testing: After making changes, test the rule services independently to ensure they work as expected before integrating them again.
  
  
  Documentation: Refer to the SAP documentation for BRF+ or the specific rule framework you are using to understand the expected signatures and how to define them correctly.
  
  
  Consult SAP Notes: Check for any relevant SAP Notes or updates that might address known issues related to this error.
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  SAP BRF+ Documentation: Familiarize yourself with the Business Rules Framework documentation to understand how to define and manage rule services effectively.
  Error Logs: Review the application logs for additional context or related errors that might provide more insight into the issue.
  Community Forums: Engage with SAP community forums or support channels where similar issues may have been discussed, and solutions shared.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to identify the cause of the error and implement a solution to resolve it.