F0320 - Table & is blocked by another user

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: F0 - FI batch program messages

• Message number: 320

• Message text: Table & is blocked by another user

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message F0320 - Table & is blocked by another user ?

  The SAP error message F0320, which states "Table & is blocked by another user," typically occurs when a user attempts to access or modify a database table that is currently locked by another user or process. This can happen in various scenarios, such as during data entry, updates, or when running certain transactions.
  Causes:
  
  Concurrent Access: Another user or process is currently accessing the same table, causing a lock.
  Long-running Transactions: A transaction that takes a long time to complete may hold a lock on the table longer than expected.
  Uncommitted Changes: If a user has made changes to the table but has not yet committed those changes, the table remains locked.
  System Errors: Occasionally, system errors or crashes can leave a table in a locked state.
  
  Solutions:
  
  Wait and Retry: If the lock is temporary, waiting for a few moments and then retrying the operation may resolve the issue.
  Identify the Locking User:
  
  Use transaction SM12 (Display and Delete Locks) to identify which user or process is holding the lock.
  You can filter by the table name or user ID to find the specific lock.
  
  
  Release the Lock:
  
  If you have the necessary authorizations, you can manually delete the lock entry in SM12. However, this should be done with caution, as it may lead to data inconsistency if the other user is in the middle of a transaction.
  
  
  Check for Long-running Transactions:
  
  Use transaction SM66 (Global Work Process Overview) to monitor active processes and identify any long-running transactions that may be causing the lock.
  
  
  Communicate with the User: If you identify the user holding the lock, communicate with them to understand if they can release the lock or if they are still working on the transaction.
  System Administration: If the issue persists, it may require intervention from a system administrator to investigate further or to check for any underlying issues in the database or application.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes:
  
  SM12: Display and Delete Locks
  SM66: Global Work Process Overview
  SM21: System Log
  
  
  Lock Management: Understanding how SAP handles locks and the different types of locks (exclusive, shared) can help in troubleshooting.
  Performance Monitoring: Regularly monitoring system performance and user activities can help prevent locking issues.
  
  Best Practices:
  
  Encourage users to commit or rollback transactions promptly to minimize locking issues.
  Implement proper training for users on how to handle transactions efficiently.
  Regularly review and optimize long-running processes to reduce the likelihood of locks.
  
  If the problem continues to occur frequently, it may be worth investigating the overall system performance and user practices to identify any underlying issues.