How To Fix ESH_CDS_VAL020 - Field &1 of view &2 derived from &3 which involves an HAVING CLAUSE

ESH_CDS_VAL020 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: ESH_CDS_VAL -

• Message number: 020

• Message text: Field &1 of view &2 derived from &3 which involves an HAVING CLAUSE

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

ESH_CDS_VAL020 - Details

• The SAP error message ESH_CDS_VAL020 typically indicates an issue with a Core Data Services (CDS) view that involves a HAVING clause. This error can occur when the fields specified in the HAVING clause are not properly aggregated or when there is a mismatch in the expected data types or values.
  
  Cause:
  
  Improper Aggregation: The fields used in the HAVING clause must be aggregated properly. If you are trying to filter on a non-aggregated field, it will lead to this error.
  Field Mismatch: The fields referenced in the HAVING clause may not exist in the context of the aggregation or may not be compatible with the aggregation functions used.
  Incorrect Syntax: There may be a syntax error in the CDS view definition, particularly in how the HAVING clause is structured.
  Data Type Issues: The data types of the fields used in the HAVING clause may not match the expected types, leading to validation errors.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Check Aggregation: Ensure