How To Fix EIDESWD449 - Required field &1 (&2) missing in message data

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: EIDESWD - Message for Change of Supplier/Service

• Message number: 449

• Message text: Required field &1 (&2) missing in message data

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message EIDESWD449 - Required field &1 (&2) missing in message data ?

  The SAP error message EIDESWD449 indicates that a required field is missing in the message data. This error typically occurs in the context of IDoc processing or when working with SAP's Application Interface Framework (AIF) or similar integration scenarios.
  Cause:
  The error is triggered when a required field, denoted by &1 (the field name) and &2 (the message type or context), is not populated in the data being processed. This can happen due to various reasons, such as:
  
  Incomplete Data: The data being sent to SAP does not include all the necessary fields.
  Mapping Issues: If you are using middleware or an interface, there may be a mapping issue where the required fields are not correctly mapped from the source system to the target system.
  Configuration Errors: There may be configuration settings in the IDoc or AIF that specify certain fields as mandatory, and these are not being fulfilled.
  User Input Errors: If the data is being entered manually, users may forget to fill in required fields.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve the EIDESWD449 error, you can take the following steps:
  
  
  Check the Message Structure: Review the message type or IDoc structure to identify which fields are marked as required. You can do this using transaction codes like WE30 (IDoc type) or WE19 (IDoc test tool).
  
  
  Validate Input Data: Ensure that the data being sent to SAP includes all required fields. If you are using an interface, check the source data to confirm that it is complete.
  
  
  Review Mapping: If you are using middleware, check the mapping configuration to ensure that all required fields are being correctly populated from the source system.
  
  
  Consult Documentation: Refer to the relevant SAP documentation or configuration guides for the specific message type or IDoc you are working with to understand the required fields.
  
  
  Error Logs: Check the error logs in SAP (transaction codes like SLG1 for application logs) to get more details about the error and the context in which it occurred.
  
  
  Testing: After making the necessary corrections, test the data submission again to ensure that the error is resolved.
  
  
  Related Information:
  
  IDoc Documentation: Familiarize yourself with IDoc structures and the specific message types you are working with.
  SAP Notes: Search for relevant SAP Notes that may address this specific error or provide additional troubleshooting steps.
  Community Forums: Consider checking SAP Community forums or other online resources for similar issues and solutions shared by other users.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to identify the missing field and correct the issue causing the EIDESWD449 error.