Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: E7 - IS-U master data
Message number: 101
Message text: Take up Jur. code transfer from contr. to connection obj. for client &1
During the upgrade, a company code was found in client &V1& that
contains &V2& as the country key. The use of tax jurisdiction codes is
active in this country key.
Starting with IS-U/CSS Release 4.61, the tax jurisdiction code is saved
in the address of the connection object, and no longer in the data for
the IS-U contract. Report ISU_TRANSFER_JDC_TO_COADDR is available to
transfer existing tax jurisdiction code, which saves you from having to
enter them again manually. This report automatically copies the value
of field <LS>Tax Jurisdiction Codes</> from all IS-U contracts to the
address of the connection object, assuming this is possible and
logical.
This report was not run in client &V1& before the upgrade, however. You
can also run the report after the upgrade. We recommend running the
report before you go live, because the following problems could occur
during production operations:
The report blocks individual contracts and connection objects, which
means clerks could be prevented from changing this data (especially
when entering move-ins and move-outs in the system)
The report cannot process contracts or connection objects that are
currently blocked by a clerk
These cases are output in the report log and have to be postprocessed
by restarting the report again for the failed connection objects after
the clerk has released the data.
Before you run the report, missing values in field <LS>Tax Jurisdiction
Code</> can result in error messages in the following cases (examples):
When changing technical master data (connection object, premise,
installation)
During move-in/move-out processing
This will result in unnecessary additional work and complications that
could prevent you from running the report.
Start report ISU_TRANSFER_JDC_TO_COADDR before you go live, if
possible. If your tight schedule does not allow it or it was simply
forgotten, we recommend running the report outside of your clerks'
regular working hours (at the weekend, for example), as the report will
have a long runtime if you have a large number of contracts and
connection objects.
Parallel execution of the report is possible. If the size of your
dataset requires parallel execution, we recommend proceeding as
follows:
Divide the total number of existing connection objects into n intervals
of approximately the same size.
Start report ISU_TRANSFER_JDC_TO_COADDR n times, once for each
interval.
Please note that if you choose parallel execution of the report, you
are responsible for ensuring that the report actually processes all the
connection objects. When you divide the set of connection object
numbers into intervals, you will have to make sure that all the
intervals are processed and that all the intervals together seamlessly
cover the complete set of connection objects.
You should always check the logs from the report runs to make sure that
all the connection objects in the run could be processed correctly.
If a business partner (for example) is blocked by a clerk (or by a
parallel run), an entry is written to the log. If you need these data
records, you will have to manually postprocess them by starting the
report again for these connection objects.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
E7101
- Take up Jur. code transfer from contr. to connection obj. for client &1 ?The SAP error message E7101, which states "Take up Jur. code transfer from contr. to connection obj. for client &1," typically relates to issues with jurisdiction codes in the context of contract management and connection objects in SAP. This error can occur in various scenarios, particularly when there is a mismatch or missing information regarding jurisdiction codes during data transfer or processing.
Cause:
- Missing Jurisdiction Code: The jurisdiction code may not be defined for the contract or connection object.
- Data Inconsistency: There may be inconsistencies in the data between the contract and the connection object, leading to the inability to transfer the jurisdiction code.
- Configuration Issues: The system configuration may not be set up correctly to handle jurisdiction codes, especially if there have been recent changes or updates.
- Client-Specific Settings: The error message indicates a client-specific issue, meaning that the problem may be related to the specific client configuration in the SAP system.
Solution:
- Check Jurisdiction Code: Verify that the jurisdiction code is correctly defined in the relevant master data (contract and connection object). Ensure that both entities have the same jurisdiction code if required.
- Data Consistency Check: Perform a consistency check between the contract and the connection object to ensure that all necessary fields, including jurisdiction codes, are populated correctly.
- Configuration Review: Review the configuration settings related to jurisdiction codes in the SAP system. Ensure that all necessary settings are in place and that there are no missing configurations.
- Client Settings: Check the client-specific settings to ensure that they are correctly configured to handle jurisdiction codes. This may involve reviewing client parameters or settings in the SAP system.
- Consult Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or notes related to jurisdiction codes and contracts for any specific guidelines or troubleshooting steps.
- SAP Support: If the issue persists, consider reaching out to SAP support for assistance, especially if this is a recurring issue or if there are underlying system bugs.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to identify the root cause of the E7101 error and implement a suitable solution.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
E7100
Error in INSERT customer table &1
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
E7099
Goods recipient &1 cannot be updated (no account group found)
What causes this issue? You tried to create a ship-to party with the number &V1&. This number was internally assigned with the number range f...
E7102
Error during processing of automation data for facts
What causes this issue? The data of the facts for the utility installation is not consistent.System Response INCLUDE ISU_VERARB OBJECT DOKU ID TXHow...
E7103
Data can and must only be entered in rule group field with outline contrt
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.