How To Fix DT363 - Search field &-&: Field defined despite constant interface

DT363 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: DT - Table activation (incl. indexes)

• Message number: 363

• Message text: Search field &-&: Field defined despite constant interface

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

DT363 - Details

• The SAP error message DT363 typically indicates that there is a mismatch or inconsistency in the definition of a field in a data structure or interface. This error often arises when a field is defined in a way that conflicts with the expected structure, particularly when a constant interface is involved.
  
  Cause:
  
  
  Field Definition Conflict: The field in question is defined in a way that does not align with the constant interface. This could be due to:
  
  The field being defined in a structure that is not compatible with the constant interface.
  The field being declared as a constant but still being defined in a way that allows for changes.
  
  
  
  Inconsistent Data Types: The data type of the field may not match the expected data type in the constant interface.
  
  
  Incorrect Interface Implementation: If you are implementing an interface, the field may not be correctly implemented according to the interface's specifications.
  
  
  
  Solution:
  
  
  Review Field Definitions: Check the definition