How To Fix DFS_POSITION_COMMON035 - Name valid to date must be later than or same as position valid to date.

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: DFS_POSITION_COMMON - Message Class for Defense Position Common

• Message number: 035

• Message text: Name valid to date must be later than or same as position valid to date.

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message DFS_POSITION_COMMON035 - Name valid to date must be later than or same as position valid to date. ?

  The SAP error message DFS_POSITION_COMMON035 indicates that there is a validation issue with the dates associated with a position in the system. Specifically, the error states that the "name valid to date" must be later than or the same as the "position valid to date." This typically occurs in the context of personnel administration or organizational management when trying to maintain or update position data.
  
  Cause:
  The error arises when there is a mismatch between the validity dates of a position and the name associated with that position. In other words, the system is enforcing a rule that the end date for the name (e.g., the name of the position holder) cannot be earlier than the end date for the position itself. This is to ensure that the position is valid for the entire duration that the name is valid.
  
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you need to ensure that the validity dates are