Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: DD_CDS_ANALYSIS - CDS code inspector messages
Message number: 300
Message text: Key Definitions of &1 and &2 are different, &3 is missing in key of &1
The explicit defined key of the view &V1& is different than the key of
the underlying data source.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
Adjust the key definition of the view by adding the key word KEY at the
appropriated elements.
This warning can be suppressed by putting the pseudo comment
/*+[hideWarning] { "IDS" : [ "KEY_CHECK" ] }*/
in front of the view definition.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
DD_CDS_ANALYSIS300
- Key Definitions of &1 and &2 are different, &3 is missing in key of &1 ?The SAP error message DD_CDS_ANALYSIS300 indicates that there is a mismatch in the key definitions of two data sources (or CDS views) in your system. Specifically, it suggests that the key definitions for the two entities (&1 and &2) are different, and that a certain field (&3) is missing in the key of the first entity (&1).
Cause:
- Key Definition Mismatch: The key fields defined in the two CDS views or data sources are not aligned. This can happen if one of the views has been modified or if there are inconsistencies in the data model.
- Missing Field: The field (&3) that is expected to be part of the key in the first entity (&1) is not present, which leads to the inconsistency.
- Data Model Changes: Changes in the underlying data model or database tables that are not reflected in the CDS views can also lead to this error.
Solution:
- Check Key Definitions: Review the key definitions of both entities (&1 and &2) to ensure they are consistent. You can do this by checking the CDS view definitions in the ABAP Development Tools or SE11 transaction.
- Add Missing Field: If the field (&3) is indeed required as part of the key for entity (&1), you may need to modify the CDS view to include this field in its key definition.
- Synchronize Changes: If there have been recent changes to the data model, ensure that all related CDS views and data sources are updated accordingly.
- Consult Documentation: Review any relevant documentation or change logs to understand why the key definitions may have diverged.
- Testing: After making changes, test the CDS views to ensure that the error is resolved and that the data is being retrieved correctly.
Related Information:
@Key
annotation.If the issue persists after following these steps, consider reaching out to your SAP support team or consulting the SAP Community for further assistance.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
DD_CDS_ANALYSIS252
$$projection cannot be used as an alias
What causes this issue? "$projection" is not allowed as an aliasHow to fix this error? Choose a different alias nameError message extract ...
DD_CDS_ANALYSIS248
Path expression can be replaced with "&1.&2"
What causes this issue? Usage of the path expression <association name>.<attribute name> can be replaced with <data source name>.&l...
DD_CDS_ANALYSIS301
&1 is calculated in view &2 and should not be used in conditions
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
DD_CDS_ANALYSIS302
Cardinality &2 of Association &1 does not match to the ON-condition
What causes this issue? The cardinality &V2& of the association &V1& does not match to the given ON-Condition: If the key-elements of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.