How To Fix CRM_PS_4S_BRFP326 - Return type for enhanced fields must be of type text

CRM_PS_4S_BRFP326 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CRM_PS_4S_BRFP - Message Class for Social Services BRF+ integration

• Message number: 326

• Message text: Return type for enhanced fields must be of type text

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CRM_PS_4S_BRFP326 - Return type for enhanced fields must be of type text ?

  The SAP error message CRM_PS_4S_BRFP326 indicates that there is an issue with the return type of enhanced fields in a Business Rule Framework (BRF+) application. Specifically, it states that the return type for enhanced fields must be of type text. This error typically arises when the data type defined for a field does not match the expected type required by the BRF+ framework.
  
  Cause:
  
  Data Type Mismatch: The enhanced field is defined with a data type that is not compatible with the expected text type. For example, if the field is defined as a number or date, but the BRF+ expects it to be a string (text).
  Configuration Error: There may be a misconfiguration in the BRF+ rules or expressions where the expected return type is not correctly set.
  Field Definition: The field in the context of the BRF+ application may not have been defined correctly, leading to a mismatch in expected data types.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Check