How To Fix CRM_BRF049 - Field &1 is not in structure &2 (runtime attribute in tag &3 is wrong)

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CRM_BRF -

• Message number: 049

• Message text: Field &1 is not in structure &2 (runtime attribute in tag &3 is wrong)

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CRM_BRF049 - Field &1 is not in structure &2 (runtime attribute in tag &3 is wrong) ?

  The SAP error message CRM_BRF049 indicates that there is an issue with a runtime attribute in the Business Rule Framework (BRF) where a field specified in the rule is not found in the expected structure. This typically occurs when the rule is trying to access a field that either does not exist in the specified structure or is incorrectly referenced.
  
  Cause:
  
  Field Not Present: The field (&1) that the rule is trying to access is not defined in the structure (&2) that is being referenced.
  Incorrect Mapping: There may be a mismatch between the field names or the structure definitions in the BRF configuration.
  Changes in Data Model: If there have been recent changes to the underlying data model or structure definitions, the rule may be referencing outdated or removed fields.
  Typographical Errors: There could be a typo in the field name or structure name in the BRF rule configuration.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Verify Field and Structure: Check the