How To Fix CNV_MBT_CR005 - Checking Rule number &1 with CR variant &2 failed.

CNV_MBT_CR005 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CNV_MBT_CR - Checking Rules and Global Parameters

• Message number: 005

• Message text: Checking Rule number &1 with CR variant &2 failed.

What causes this issue?

There was a Checking Rule that failed. The message shows which Checking
Rule with which Checking Rule variant caused that message.

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

How to fix this error?

You get details about the Checking Rule and Checking Rule variant by
entering the transaction code CNV_MBT_CR into the command field. You
will get a list with all available Checking Rules. From here you get all
the information you need to get familiarly with the Checking Rule and
the Checking Rule variant. For details how to use and navigate in the
overview click on the information button (@0S@).

Procedure for System Administrators

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

CNV_MBT_CR005 - Details

• The SAP error message CNV_MBT_CR005 indicates that there is an issue with a checking rule in the context of a data migration or conversion process, specifically when using the SAP Migration Cockpit or similar tools. The error message typically means that a specific checking rule (identified by the rule number) with a certain conversion variant has failed validation.
  
  Cause:
  
  Data Quality Issues: The data being processed may not meet the criteria defined in the checking rule. This could be due to missing values, incorrect formats, or data that does not conform to expected standards.
  
  Configuration Issues: The conversion variant may not be properly configured, leading to conflicts with the checking rules.
  Incompatibility: The data being migrated may not be compatible with the target system or the rules defined for the migration.
  Custom Rules: If there are custom rules defined, they may not be functioning as expected or may have errors in their logic.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Review the Data: