Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CNV_20100 - Messageclass for chart of account conversion
Message number: 250
Message text: Impl. merge of G/L acct &1 with sec. CostEl &2 due to merge in exist. CoA
The system found that the G/L account &V1& will be converted into &V3&
(according to the mapping). However there is already a secondary cost
element called &V3&, which does not get converted into another value.
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
In effect, this means that a G/L account and a secondary cost element
are going to be merged (implicit merge). This is not allowed.
The conversion cannot take place.
Change the mapping table accordingly.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
CNV_20100250
- Impl. merge of G/L acct &1 with sec. CostEl &2 due to merge in exist. CoA ?The SAP error message CNV_20100250 typically occurs during the process of merging General Ledger (G/L) accounts with secondary cost elements in the context of a migration or conversion project, particularly when using the SAP S/4HANA Migration Cockpit or similar tools. This error indicates that there is an attempt to merge a G/L account with a secondary cost element due to a merge in the existing Chart of Accounts (CoA).
Cause:
- Merging of G/L Accounts: The error arises when there is a conflict in the mapping of G/L accounts and secondary cost elements during the migration process. This can happen if the system detects that the G/L account you are trying to merge has a corresponding secondary cost element that is also being merged or has been defined in a way that conflicts with the existing mappings.
- Chart of Accounts Configuration: The issue may also stem from the configuration of the Chart of Accounts, where the G/L accounts and cost elements are not aligned properly, leading to conflicts during the merge process.
Solution:
- Review Mapping: Check the mapping of G/L accounts and secondary cost elements in your migration project. Ensure that there are no conflicts in the mappings and that each G/L account is correctly associated with its corresponding cost element.
- Adjust Merging Rules: If necessary, adjust the merging rules in the migration tool to ensure that the G/L accounts and cost elements are merged correctly without conflicts.
- Consult Documentation: Refer to the SAP documentation related to the migration process for specific guidelines on handling G/L accounts and cost elements. This may provide insights into best practices and common pitfalls.
- Test in a Sandbox Environment: Before applying changes in the production environment, test the merging process in a sandbox or development environment to identify and resolve any issues without impacting live data.
- Seek SAP Support: If the issue persists, consider reaching out to SAP support for assistance. They may provide specific patches or guidance based on the version of SAP you are using.
Related Information:
By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the error CNV_20100250 and successfully complete the merging process in your SAP environment.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CNV_20100249
Alternative account of &1 differs from &2 in company code &3 (SKB1-ALTKT)
change the mapping table accordingly. Check if you really want the merge to take place in this way. If not,How to fix this error? The conversion can...
CNV_20100248
In FAGL_011ZC for VERSN=&1,ERGSL=&2,ChartAcc_new=&3: Overlap of intervals
What causes this issue? In table FAGL_011ZC (assignment FS items - G/L account) for target chart of accounts <(>&<)>V3& for finan...
CNV_20100251
Implicit merge of G/L acct &1 with secondary CostEl &2 due to CoA change
What causes this issue? The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved. Proc...
CNV_20100252
Implicit merge of G/L account &1 with secondary cost element &2
What causes this issue? The system found that the G/L account &V1& is converted into &V3& (according to the mapping). However there i...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.