Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CNV_20100 - Messageclass for chart of account conversion
Message number: 184
Message text: Target account &2 exists already, implicit merge by CoA rename
When checking the G/L accounts you want to merge, the system found that
as a result of the chart of accounts change the account &V1& will be
changed into target account &V2&.
However target account &V2& already exists in the database.
Target account &V2& itself is not used as the source account (&V2& ->
XXXX) for another mapping or for a merge of accounts.
This means that account &V1& is implicitly merged with existing account
&V2& at <DS:TX.CNV_20100_TX_ASEGMENT>A level</>.
At <DS:TX.CNV_20100_TX_BSEGMENT>B level</>, however, the mapping (&V1&
-> &V2&) will not result in a merge (G/L account number is not changed).
This has the following consequences. You need:
to find out if the implicit merge is correct from a logical point of
view
to explicitely include the entry &V1& -> &V2& to the mapping
to consider the priority indicator. If the priority indicator is not
set, it is not clear which settings will take priority when the accounts
&V1& and &V2& are merged into &V2&
The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.
<ZH>Regarding item 2:</>
Explicitely include the mapping &V1& -> &V2& in the mapping table so
that at least the following entries exist in the mapping table:
&V1& -> &V2&
&V2& -> &V2&
If applicable, any other mapping with target account &V2&.
This allows the system to check the merge for logical correctness.
A troubleshooting activity is associated to this activity which supports
you in creating the required mapping entries to resolve the implicit
merges.
<ZH>Regarding item 3:</>
Set the priority indicator for one of the entries with target account
&V2&.
&NOTE&
It is possible to do the conversion without setting the priority
indicator. However then it is undefined which source account settings
the target account &V2& will get.
In this case you should check the settings in the A segment (master data
in chart of accounts, transaction FSP3) and B segment (master data in
company code, transaction FSS3) for the relevant account &V2& after the
conversion.
&ADDITIONAL_HINTS&
The priority indicator must not be set more than <ZH>once</> for all
merges to a given target account. This is also valid for cross-chart of
accounts merges.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
CNV_20100184
- Target account &2 exists already, implicit merge by CoA rename ?The SAP error message CNV_20100184 indicates that during a data migration or conversion process, a target account already exists in the system. This typically occurs when using the SAP Conversion or Migration tools, particularly in the context of a Chart of Accounts (CoA) rename or mapping process.
Cause:
The error arises when:
To resolve this error, you can take the following steps:
Check Existing Accounts:
&2
in the error message) already exists in the system. You can do this by checking the relevant tables or using transaction codes like FS00
(G/L Account Master Record) to see if the account is already defined.Review Mapping:
Adjust Migration Settings:
Implicit Merge Handling:
Consult Documentation:
Testing:
FS00
for G/L account maintenance, OBY6
for managing Chart of Accounts, and OBD2
for account assignment.By following these steps, you should be able to address the error CNV_20100184 effectively.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CNV_20100183
No country-specific CoA will be implemented; no action required
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
CNV_20100182
Country-specific CoA &3 will be implemented for company code &4
What causes this issue? According to the mapping table, you want to transfer/restructure the previous operative chart of accounts &V1& into &...
CNV_20100185
CoA merge: Source account &1 exists; implicit merge by CoA rename
What causes this issue? As a consequence of the planned chart of accounts merge, implicit account merges will occur as well. When checking the G/L ac...
CNV_20100186
No priority indicator set at B level for G/L account &1 &2 in CoCd &3
What causes this issue? The system found that you did not set the priority indicator for the <DS:TX.CNV_20100_TX_BSEGMENT>B segment</> me...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.