How To Fix CNV_10020777 - Conflict for non-transparent field &1 &2; &3 and &4 overlap

CNV_10020777 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CNV_10020 - Message class for package 10020

• Message number: 777

• Message text: Conflict for non-transparent field &1 &2; &3 and &4 overlap

What causes this issue?

For the non-transparent field &V1& with value &V2& the two components
&V3& and &V4& have been evaluated. The intervals shown in brackets refer
to the character positions of the components in the non-transparent
field value. It has been detected that these components overlap.

System Response

The component &V4& is treated like it has not been found in the
non-transparent field.

How to fix this error?

Check the rules assigned to both components and correct the wrong one.
&HINTS&
If you determine that the overlapping is not problematic, you can switch
off conflict detection. If you do so, the component &V4& will be handled
the same way as if there was no conflict. To switch off conflict
detection, see the documentation for parameter ITR_CONFLICT_DETECTION in
transaction CNV_10020_PARAM.

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

CNV_10020777 - Details

• The SAP error message CNV_10020777, which indicates a conflict for non-transparent fields, typically arises during data migration or conversion processes, particularly when using the SAP S/4HANA Migration Cockpit or similar tools. This error suggests that there is an overlap in the data mapping or transformation rules for non-transparent fields, which can lead to conflicts in how data is processed.
  
  Cause:
  
  Field Overlap: The error occurs when two or more non-transparent fields are mapped to the same target field or when their data ranges overlap in a way that is not allowed.
  Data Mapping Issues: Incorrect or conflicting data mapping rules in the migration or conversion process can lead to this error.
  Inconsistent Data Structures: If the source and target systems have different data structures or definitions for the same fields, it can cause conflicts.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Review Mapping Rules: Check the mapping rules defined in the migration or conversion project. Ensure that non-transparent fields are mapped correctly