How To Fix CNV20551086 - Object type &1: Check field &2 does not exist in DDIC

CNV20551086 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CNV20551 - message for package 20551 (company code delete)

• Message number: 086

• Message text: Object type &1: Check field &2 does not exist in DDIC

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

CNV20551086 - Details

• The SAP error message CNV20551086 indicates that there is an issue related to a field that is expected to exist in the Data Dictionary (DDIC) but does not. This error typically arises during data migration or conversion processes, particularly when using SAP's Data Migration tools or during system upgrades.
  
  Cause:
  The error message CNV20551086 is triggered when:
  
  The specified field (&2) is not defined in the Data Dictionary for the object type (&1).
  There may be a mismatch between the source and target systems, where the field exists in the source but not in the target.
  The field may have been deleted or renamed in the target system.
  There could be a configuration issue or a missing transport that should have included the field definition.
  
  
  Solution:
  To resolve this error, you can take the following steps:
  
  
  Check the Data Dictionary:
  
  Use transaction SE11 to check if the field (&2) exists in the specified object type (&1). If it does not