Do you have any question about this error?
Message type: E = Error
Message class: CNV - Conversion: Messages for Conversion Services (CNCC)
Message number: 036
Message text: Different FORM routines found: &1 &2
During blending of the source packages at least two different
(conversion or aggregate) routines were assigned to the same field.
When two different conversion packages are blended together and both of
them indicate that they are configured to convert the same field of the
same table then conflict occurs (as long as these two packages use
different routines for conversion). This can happen for example if the
table field contain some non-transparently stored data ("many values" in
one field).
Packages cannot be blended together.
A top-level package can be created to resolve the conflicts. If the
source packages are meant to be executed together contact SAP support.
Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.
CNV036
- Different FORM routines found: &1 &2 ?The SAP error message CNV036, which states "Different FORM routines found: &1 &2," typically occurs during data migration or conversion processes, particularly when using the SAP Conversion Tools or during the execution of programs that involve FORM routines. This error indicates that there are two different FORM routines with the same name but located in different programs or function modules, which can lead to ambiguity in execution.
Cause:
- Duplicate FORM Routines: The error arises when the same FORM routine name is defined in multiple locations (e.g., different programs or function modules) but with different implementations.
- Inconsistent Code: The routines may have been modified independently, leading to discrepancies in their logic or functionality.
- Namespace Conflicts: If custom developments or enhancements have been made, they might conflict with standard SAP routines.
Solution:
- Identify the Routines: Check the details of the error message to identify the two FORM routines (denoted by &1 and &2). You can use transaction SE80 or SE37 to locate the routines.
- Review the Code: Compare the implementations of both FORM routines to understand the differences. This may involve checking the logic, parameters, and any dependencies.
- Rename or Refactor: If the routines serve different purposes, consider renaming one of them to avoid the conflict. If they are meant to be the same, consolidate the logic into a single routine.
- Adjust Program Logic: Ensure that the program or function module calling the FORM routine is referencing the correct one. This may involve modifying the call to explicitly specify the correct routine.
- Check for Enhancements: If the routines are part of a custom enhancement, review the enhancement implementation to ensure it does not conflict with standard SAP code.
- Testing: After making changes, thoroughly test the affected programs to ensure that the issue is resolved and that the functionality remains intact.
Related Information:
If the issue persists after following these steps, consider reaching out to SAP support or consulting with a developer who has experience with the specific programs involved.
Get instant SAP help. Start your 7-day free trial now.
CNV035
Table &1 does not exist in Data Dictionary.
What causes this issue? The specified table is to be created. However no definition was found. The table is probably package-specific.System Response...
CNV034
No records that should be deleted found in table &1
What causes this issue? Before you can explicitly <ZK>delete a package</> or overwrite an existing package, you need to delete any existi...
CNV037
Incorrect sequence for package &1 table &2 field &3
What causes this issue? During package blending it occured that the the field &V3& has different sequential number assigned in at least two s...
CNV038
Read-only flag deleted and conversion routine entered for field &1-&2
Self-Explanatory Message Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of...
Click on this link to search all SAP messages.