How To Fix CMX_POC_WI013 - Status object &1 for order &2 not found

CMX_POC_WI013 - Overview

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CMX_POC_WI - PP-PI-PMA: PI Sheet Messages, SCM Add-On

• Message number: 013

• Message text: Status object &1 for order &2 not found

What causes this issue?

Work instructions can be deleted only if the associated production order
does not have the status EBRR (order record necessary).
The status of order &V2& could not be checked because the associated
status object &V1& was not found due to an internal error. Therefor,
order &V2& cannot be taken into account in the selection. You cannot
delete the associated work instructions.

System Response

The system issues an error message and will not allow you to continue with this transaction until the error is resolved.

How to fix this error?

INCLUDE NA_SYSVERW OBJECT DOKU ID TX LANGUAGE EN

Error message extract from SAP system. Copyright SAP SE.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CMX_POC_WI013 - Status object &1 for order &2 not found ?

  The SAP error message CMX_POC_WI013 indicates that a status object for a specific order could not be found. This error typically arises in the context of SAP's Project Management or Order Management modules, where the system is trying to access or manipulate an order that does not have a corresponding status object.
  
  Cause:
  
  Missing Status Object: The status object for the specified order may not have been created or may have been deleted.
  Incorrect Order Number: The order number provided in the error message may be incorrect or does not exist in the system.
  Data Inconsistency: There may be inconsistencies in the database or issues with data synchronization that prevent the system from locating the status object.
  Authorization Issues: The user may not have the necessary permissions to access the status object for the specified order.
  
  
  Solution:
  
  Verify Order Number: Check the order number provided in the error message to ensure it is correct and exists in