How To Fix CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS218 - Key field &1 has different positions

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS - Messages for the ATC checks on clash objects

• Message number: 218

• Message text: Key field &1 has different positions

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS218 - Key field &1 has different positions ?

  The SAP error message CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS218 indicates that there is a conflict in the key field definitions between two or more objects, specifically that the key field &1 has different positions in the involved objects. This typically occurs during operations such as data migration, table joins, or when defining views or data models where the same key field is expected to align but does not.
  Cause:
  
  Inconsistent Key Field Definitions: The key field &1 is defined in different tables or structures with varying positions. This inconsistency can lead to issues when SAP tries to process or join these objects.
  Data Model Changes: Changes in the data model, such as adding or removing fields, can lead to discrepancies in how key fields are defined across different objects.
  Custom Development: Custom tables or structures may have been created with different definitions for the same key field, leading to conflicts.
  
  Solution:
  
  Review Key Field Definitions: Check the definitions of the key field &1 in the involved objects (tables, structures, views) to ensure they are consistent. This includes checking the data element, field type, and position.
  Align Key Field Positions: If you find discrepancies, you may need to modify the definitions to ensure that the key field has the same position across all relevant objects.
  Adjust Data Model: If the inconsistency arises from changes in the data model, consider reverting to a previous version or updating all related objects to align with the new model.
  Testing: After making changes, perform thorough testing to ensure that the issue is resolved and that there are no further conflicts.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: You may use transaction codes like SE11 (Data Dictionary), SE80 (Object Navigator), or SE37 (Function Module) to investigate and modify the definitions of the objects involved.
  Documentation: Review SAP documentation or notes related to data model changes or specific error messages for additional context and guidance.
  SAP Community: Engaging with the SAP Community or forums can provide insights from other users who may have encountered similar issues.
  
  By addressing the key field definition inconsistencies, you should be able to resolve the CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS218 error and proceed with your operations in SAP.