How To Fix CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS215 - Field &1 has different component types: local &2, remote &3

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS - Messages for the ATC checks on clash objects

• Message number: 215

• Message text: Field &1 has different component types: local &2, remote &3

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS215 - Field &1 has different component types: local &2, remote &3 ?

  The SAP error message CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS215 indicates that there is a mismatch in the component types of a field in a data structure or table. Specifically, the error message states that the field &1 has different component types: local &2 and remote &3. This typically occurs in scenarios involving data dictionary objects, such as when you are trying to use a field from a local structure that has a different type than the corresponding field in a remote structure or table.
  Cause:
  
  Type Mismatch: The field in question has been defined with different data types in different contexts (local vs. remote). For example, a field might be defined as a CHAR type in one structure and as a NUMC type in another.
  Inconsistent Data Dictionary Definitions: If the data dictionary definitions of the structures or tables are not synchronized, it can lead to this error.
  Incorrect Mapping: When mapping fields between local and remote structures, if the types do not match, this error can occur.
  
  Solution:
  
  Check Data Types: Review the definitions of the field in both the local and remote structures or tables. Ensure that the data types are consistent. You can do this by navigating to the Data Dictionary (SE11) and checking the field definitions.
  Adjust Definitions: If you find that the data types are indeed different, you will need to adjust one of the definitions to ensure they match. This may involve changing the data type in the local structure or the remote structure, depending on your requirements.
  Rebuild Objects: After making changes, you may need to activate the affected objects and possibly rebuild any dependent objects to ensure that the changes take effect.
  Check for Transport Issues: If this error occurs after a transport, ensure that the transport did not miss any changes related to the data dictionary objects.
  
  Related Information:
  
  Transaction Codes: Use transaction codes like SE11 (Data Dictionary), SE80 (Object Navigator), or SE37 (Function Module) to investigate the definitions of the objects involved.
  Documentation: Refer to SAP documentation or help resources for more information on data types and structures.
  Debugging: If the error occurs during runtime, consider using the debugger to trace where the mismatch is happening in the code.
  
  By following these steps, you should be able to identify and resolve the cause of the CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS215 error in your SAP system.