How To Fix CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS215 - Field &1 has different component types: local &2, remote &3

SAP Error Message - Details

• Message type: E = Error

• Message class: CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS - Messages for the ATC checks on clash objects

• Message number: 215

• Message text: Field &1 has different component types: local &2, remote &3

Self-Explanatory Message

Since SAP believes that this specific error message is 'self-explanatory,' no more information has been given.The majority of messages in the SAP system have a message text, however this is frequently insufficient to comprehend or resolve the problem.

To make things easier, more detailed information is frequently added to describe the issue, how to fix it, and the necessary steps or configuration modifications.

Unfortunately, there isn't any extra information in this error notice.

What else can you do?

First, use our AnswerBot below to get a possible cause and solution (requires a premium subscription).

Also, review the in-depth Common Questions & Answers listed below; you could discover a solution there or be able to connect with others who have faced similar challenges.

You can also try searching the SAP support portal (support.sap.com) but you need a special user ID to access it. It is possible that an SAP support note exists that provides additional details about the mistake or even steps for fixing it.

Smart SAP Assistant

• What is the cause and solution for SAP error message CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS215 - Field &1 has different component types: local &2, remote &3 ?

  The SAP error message CHK_CLASH_OBJECTS215 indicates that there is a mismatch in the component types of a field in a data structure or table. Specifically, the error message states that the field &1 has different component types: local &2 and remote &3. This typically occurs in scenarios involving data dictionary objects, such as when you are trying to use a field from a local structure that has a different type than the corresponding field in a remote structure or table.
  
  Cause:
  
  Type Mismatch: The field in question has been defined with different data types in different contexts (local vs. remote). For example, a field might be defined as a CHAR type in one structure and as a NUMC type in another.
  Inconsistent Data Dictionary Definitions: If the data dictionary definitions of the structures or tables are not synchronized, it can lead to this error.
  Incorrect Mapping: When mapping fields between local and remote structures,